Maverick Banes vs Marc Polmans Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L W L L W W
Form
L W L L L W L L W LHead-2-Head: Banes 6 - 4 Polmans
They have played 24 sets in total, with Banes winning 15 and Polmans winning 9. The last match between Banes and Polmans was at the Bangalore Challenger, 12-11-2018, First, Hard with Marc Polmans getting the victory 1-6 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maverick Banes | 6 |
| Marc Polmans | 4 |
| Banes | Stats | Polmans |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (2-4) |
| 6 | Head-to-Head | 4 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 436 |
| 216 | Highest Rank | 116 |
| 33 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 13 |
| 57% (295-220) | Career Total W/L | 55% (343-280) |
| $720 | Career Prize Money | $642,775 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 5 | Hard H2H | 2 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 2 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Marc Polmans
Player
Maverick Banes
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
52%
(
42 of
81)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| 6-3 5-7 6-3 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Maverick Banes
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
4
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
3
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
104)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| 6-7(5) 7-6(1) 6-4 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Maverick Banes
73%
(
72 of
99)
1st Serve %
65%
(
86 of
133)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
0
81%
(
58 of
72)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
58 of
86)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
25%
(
25 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
51 of
133)
125
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats
Maverick Banes
Player
Marc Polmans
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Maverick Banes
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Maverick Banes
Player
Marc Polmans
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(5) |
Stats
Maverick Banes
Player
Marc Polmans
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 7-5 | |||||
| 6-1 6-1 | |||||
| 6-4 6-0 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 | H2H Matches | 4 |
| 15 | Sets Won | 9 |
| 127 | Games Won | 102 |
| 21 | Aces (Total) | 20 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 31 |
| 1:17:24 | Average Match Time | 1:17:24 |
| 62% (347/563) | 1st Serve % | 66% (328/499) |
| 67% (233/347) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (225/328) |
| 48% (104/216) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (84/171) |
| 56% (23/41) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (21/54) |
| 38% (190/499) | Return Points Win % | 40% (226/563) |
| 60% (6/10) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 40% (4/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 25% (1/4) | Deciding Set Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 71% (7/5) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) |
| 29% (7/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (7/2) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Maverick Banes vs Marc Polmans Best Odds For The Match
Maverick Banes Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 5-7 10-9 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-3 10-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Marc Polmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Karl Poling
Player
Marc Polmans
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Benjamin Willwerth
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
0
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Blaise Bicknell
Player
Marc Polmans
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thomas Braithwaite
Player
Marc Polmans
73%
(
93 of
127)
1st Serve %
71%
(
82 of
116)
20
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
68 of
93)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
63 of
82)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
32%
(
41 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
40 of
116)
126
Total Points Won
117
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Jack Bruce-Smith
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
3
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Marc Polmans
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
11
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Marc Polmans
44%
(
17 of
39)
1st Serve %
72%
(
28 of
39)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
41
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Marc Polmans
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
10
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Edward Winter
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Marc Polmans
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Banes vs Polmans?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Banes Vs Polmans is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (295/220) | Win/Loss | 55% (343/280) |
| 56% (660/524) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (793/681) |
| 53% (5804/5198) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7191/6700) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 823 | Aces Total | 1772 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 614 | Total Double Faults | 1796 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:32:17 |
| 560.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 236.72 |
| 62% (12410/19863) | 1st Serve % | 65% (25676/39243) |
| 68% (8464/12410) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (17382/25676) |
| 53% (3913/7453) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6739/13567) |
| 47% (873/1875) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1719/4031) |
| 40% (7930/19787) | Return Points Win % | 40% (16033/39738) |
| 57% (291/507) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (332/600) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 47% (7/15) |
| 51% (77/150) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (91/186) |
| 54% (86/160) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (112/214) |
| 87% (288/250) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (338/286) |
| 13% (288/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (338/52) |
| 19% (227/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (283/57) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
